JCSIS
019928311823 info@jcsis.org
JCSIS

Graph Neural Network-Based Power Flow Optimization for Large-Scale Renewable Energy Integration in Smart Grids.

Lima Hongou
Volume 5

Abstract

Large-scale integration of renewable energy resources into smart grids introduces significant operational challenges due to the intermittent, distributed, and uncertain nature of photovoltaic and wind power generation. As renewable penetration increases, power systems become more dynamic and complex, requiring advanced optimization methods capable of maintaining voltage stability, minimizing transmission losses, preventing line congestion, improving renewable energy utilization, and ensuring reliable power delivery under variable operating conditions. Conventional power flow optimization methods, including Newton–Raphson-based optimal power flow, linearized approximations, and traditional numerical solvers, can provide accurate solutions but may become computationally demanding for large-scale grids with high-dimensional topology, nonlinear constraints, and rapidly changing renewable generation profiles. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a Graph Neural Network (GNN)-based power flow optimization framework for large-scale renewable energy integration in smart grids.

The proposed framework represents the power grid as a graph structure, where buses, generators, substations, renewable energy units, energy storage systems, and loads are modeled as nodes, while transmission lines, transformers, and distribution feeders are modeled as edges. Node features include active and reactive power injection, voltage magnitude, voltage angle, renewable generation output, load demand, generator limits, battery state of charge, and local operational constraints. Edge features include line impedance, admittance, thermal capacity, power flow direction, transformer tap settings, and congestion indicators. By explicitly learning from the topological structure of the grid, the GNN model captures spatial dependencies, electrical coupling relationships, and nonlinear interactions among geographically distributed power system components.

The core architecture employs message-passing neural networks, graph convolutional networks, graph attention networks, and physics-informed graph learning modules to approximate optimal power flow solutions under renewable-rich operating scenarios. The model is trained using historical grid operation data, simulated power flow cases, renewable generation profiles, and load demand scenarios generated from benchmark systems and real-world smart grid measurements. A comprehensive preprocessing pipeline is applied, including grid topology encoding, normalization of electrical variables, renewable uncertainty modeling, scenario generation, constraint labeling, and feature construction for both node-level and edge-level representations. To improve physical consistency, the framework incorporates power balance constraints, voltage limits, line flow limits, generator capacity constraints, and penalty terms for constraint violations within the training objective.

The proposed GNN-based optimizer can support multiple operational tasks, including AC optimal power flow approximation, congestion management, voltage regulation, renewable curtailment minimization, distributed energy resource coordination, and energy storage dispatch. It is designed to operate across different grid configurations and can generalize to changing network topologies, such as line outages, distributed generation expansion, or reconfiguration of distribution feeders. Model performance is evaluated using standard power system and optimization metrics, including total active power loss, voltage deviation, renewable curtailment rate, operating cost, line overload reduction, constraint violation rate, solution feasibility, computational time, and optimality gap. Comparative analysis is conducted against conventional optimal power flow solvers, DC power flow approximations, mixed-integer optimization methods, deep neural network baselines, and non-graph-based machine learning approaches.

Experimental evaluation is expected to demonstrate that the proposed GNN framework achieves near-optimal power flow solutions with significantly reduced computational latency, making it suitable for real-time and near-real-time smart grid operation. By leveraging graph-based representation learning, the model can better capture the structural dependencies of power networks compared with conventional feed-forward neural networks that ignore grid topology. In addition, interpretability mechanisms such as graph attention visualization, node importance analysis, edge congestion attribution, and sensitivity mapping are incorporated to help grid operators understand which buses, lines, or renewable injection points have the greatest influence on optimization decisions.

The proposed GNN-based power flow optimization framework provides a scalable, topology-aware, and computationally efficient solution for smart grids with high renewable energy penetration. By combining graph representation learning with power system operational constraints, the framework can enhance renewable energy integration, reduce transmission losses, improve voltage stability, mitigate congestion, and support secure real-time grid management. Its adaptability to large-scale and dynamically changing grid topologies makes it a promising tool for next-generation energy management systems and renewable-dominant power networks.

Keywords

References

  • [1] El-Kenawy, E. S. M., Khodadadi, N., Mirjalili, S., Abdelhamid, A. A., Eid, M. M., & Ibrahim, A. (2024). Greylag goose optimizati on:
  • [2] Abdollahzadeh, B., Khodadadi, N., Barshandeh, S., Trojovský, P., Gharehchopogh, F. S., El -kenawy, E. S. M., ... & Mirjalili, S. (2024).
  • [3] El-Kenawy, E. S. M., Ibrahim, A., Mirjalili, S., Eid, M. M., & Hussein, S. E. (2020). Novel feature selection and voting classif ier
  • [4] El-Kenawy, E. S. M., Eid, M. M., Saber, M., & Ibrahim, A. (2020). MbGWO -SFS: Modified binary grey wolf optimizer based on
  • [5] El-Kenawy, E. S., & Eid, M. (2020). Hybrid gray wolf and particle swarm optimization for feature selection. Int. J. Innov. Compu t. Inf.
  • [6] El-Kenawy, E. S. M., Mirjalili, S., Ibrahim, A., Alrahmawy, M., El -Said, M., Zaki, R. M., & Eid, M. M. (2021). Advanced meta -
  • [7] Khodadadi, N., Abualigah, L., El -Kenawy, E. S. M., Snasel, V., & Mirjalili, S. (2022). An archive -based multi -objective arithmetic
  • [8] Ibrahim, A., Mirjalili, S., El -Said, M., Ghoneim, S. S., Al -Harthi, M. M., Ibrahim, T. F., & El -Kenawy, E. S. M. (2021). Wind speed
  • [9] Abdelhamid, A. A., El -Kenawy, E. S. M., Alotaibi, B., Amer, G. M., Abdelkader, M. Y., Ibrahim, A., & Eid, M. M. (2022). Robust
  • [10] El-Kenawy, E. S. M., Mirjalili, S., Alassery, F., Zhang, Y. D., Eid, M. M., El -Mashad, S. Y., ... & Abdelhamid, A. A. (2022). Novel
  • [11] Hassib, E. M., El -Desouky, A. I., Labib, L. M., & El -Kenawy, E. S. M. (2020). WOA+ BRNN: An imbalanced big data classification
  • [12] Eid, M. M., El -kenawy, E. S. M., & Ibrahim, A. (2021, March). A binary sine cosine -modified whale optimization algorithm for feature
  • [13] El-Sayed Towfek, M. (2018). El -kenawy. Trust Model for Dependable File Exchange in Cloud Computing. International Journal of
  • [14] Abdelhamid, A. A., Towfek, S. K., Khodadadi, N., Alhussan, A. A., Khafaga, D. S., Eid, M. M., & Ibrahim, A. (2023). Waterwhee l plant
  • [15] El-Kenawy, E. S. M., Abdelhamid, A. A., Ibrahim, A., Mirjalili, S., Khodadad, N., Alduailij, M. A., ... & Khafaga, D. S. (2023). Al-
  • [16] Alhussan, A. A., Abdelhamid, A. A., El -Kenawy, E. S. M., Ibrahim, A., Eid, M. M., Khafaga, D. S., & Ahmed, A. E. (2023). A binary
  • [17] Alhussan, A. A., Khafaga, D. S., Abotaleb, M., Mishra, P., & El -Kenawy, E. S. M. (2024). Global Potato Production Forecasting Based
  • [18] Towfek, S. K., & Alhussan, A. A. (2024). Potato Production Forecasting Based on Balance Dynamic Biruni Earth Radius Algorithm for
  • [19] Mishra, P., Alhussan, A. A., Khafaga, D. S., Lal, P., Ray, S., Abotaleb, M., ... & El -Kenawy, E. S. M. (2024). Forecasting production of
  • [20] El-Kenawy, E. S. M., Mirjalili, S., Abdelhamid, A. A., Ibrahim, A., Khodadadi, N., & Eid, M. M. (2022). Meta -heuristic optimization
  • [21] Abdelhamid, A. A., El -Kenawy, E. S. M., Khodadadi, N., Mirjalili, S., Khafaga, D. S., Alharbi, A. H., ... & Saber, M. (2022).
  • [22] Alharbi, A. H., Towfek, S. K., Abdelhamid, A. A., Ibrahim, A., Eid, M. M., & Khafaga, D. S. & Saber, M.(2023). Diagnosis of
  • [23] Alhussan, A. A., & Towfek, S. K. (2024). 5G Resource Allocation Using Feature Selection and Greylag Goose Optimization Algori thm.
  • [24] Towfek, S. K., & Alhussan, A. A. (2024). Potato Production Forecasting Based on Balance Dynamic Biruni Earth Radius Algorithm for
  • [25] Abdelhamid, A. A., Alhussan, A. A., Qenawy, A. S. T., Osman, A. M., Elshewey, A. M., & Eed, M. (2024). Potato harvesting pred iction
  • [26] Eed, M., Alhussan, A. A., Qenawy, A. S. T., Osman, A. M., Elshewey, A. M., & Arnous, R. (2024). Potato Consumption Forecastin g
  • [27] Mahmood, S., Sun, H., Iqbal, A., Alhussan, A. A., & El -kenawy, E. S. M. (2024). Green finance, sustainable infrastructure, and green
  • [28] El-Kenawy, E. S. M., Alhussan, A. A., Khodadadi, N., Mirjalili, S., & Eid, M. M. (2024). Predicting potato crop yield with machi ne
  • [29] Radwan, M., Alhussan, A. A., Ibrahim, A., & Tawfeek, S. M. (2025). Potato leaf disease classification using optimized machine learning
  • [30] Ghasemi, M., Khodadadi, N., Trojovský, P., Li, L., Mansor, Z., Abualigah, L., ... & El -Kenawy, E. S. M. (2025). Kirchhoff’s law
  • [31] Yassen, M. A., El -Kenawy, E. S. M., Abdel -Fattah, M. G., Ismail, I., & Mostafa, H. E. D. S. (2025). Explainable artificial intelligence
  • [32] Radwan, M., Alhussan, A. A., Ibrahim, A., & Tawfeek, S. M. (2025). Potato leaf disease classification using optimized machine learning
  • [33] Mozhdehi, A. T., Khodadadi, N., Aboutalebi, M., El -Kenawy, E. S. M., Hussien, A. G., Zhao, W., ... & Mirjalili, S. (2025). Divine
  • [34] El-kenawy, E. S. M., Alhussan, A. A., Mattar, E. A., & Radwan, M. (2026). Feature selection and hyperparameter tuning in transfo rmer -
  • [35] Chen, L., Xu, C., Lim, W. H., Sharma, A., Tiang, S. S., Chong, K. S., ... & Khafaga, D. S. (2025). Transparent and reliable c onstruction
  • [36] Khodadadi, N., Towfek, S. K., Zaki, A. M., Alharbi, A. H., Khodadadi, E., Khafaga, D. S., ... & Eid, M. M. (2025). Predicting
  • [37] Alhussan, A. A., El -Kenawy, E. S. M., Khafaga, D. S., Alharbi, A. H., & Eid, M. M. (2025). Groundwater resource prediction and
  • [38] Mozhdehi, A. T., Khodadadi, N., Aboutalebi, M., El -Kenawy, E. S. M., Hussien, A. G., Zhao, W., ... & Mirjalili, S. (2025). Divine
  • [39] Lopes, J. M., Pinho, C. S., Martins, R. C., & Bandeira, T. (2026). Sustainability Gets Smarter: Competitive Pressure and AI L eading the
  • [40] Radwan, M., Ibrahim, A., Abdelsalam, M. M., Alhussan, A. A., Mattar, E. A., & El -Kenawy, E. S. M. (2026). Optimizing solar and wind
  • [41] Alhussan, A. A., El -Kenawy, E. S. M., Eid, M. M., & Khodadadi, N. (2026). Hybrid Al -Biruni and Puma Optimization (BERPO) for
  • [42] El-Kenawy, E. S. M., Ibrahim, A., Alhussan, A. A., Khafaga, D. S., Ahmed, A. E., & Eid, M. M. (2026). Smart city electricity loa d
  • [43] El-Kenawy, E. S. M., Khodadadi, N., Mirjalili, S., Zaki, A. M., Ibrahim, A., Alhussan, A. A., ... & Eid, M. M. (2026). Glider sn ake
  • [44] Mekaret, F., Rabehi, A., Zebentout, B., Tizi, S., Douara, A., Bellucci, S., ... & Alhussan, A. A. (2024). A comparative study of Schottky
  • [45] KOUADRI, Ali, RABEHI, Abdelhalim, BENZIANE, Ali, et al. A Robust Multi -Transform Watermarking Scheme for Medical Images
  • [46] Tibermacine, I. E., Russo, S., Scarano, G., Tedesco, G., Rabehi, A., Alhussan, A. A., ... & Napoli, C. (2025). Conditional VA E for
  • [47] Kouadri, A., Benziane, A., Rabehi, A., Rabehi, A., Alhussan, A. A., Khafaga, D. S., & El -Kenawy, E. S. M. (2025). A novel hybrid
  • [48] Russo, S., Tibermacine, I. E., Randieri, C., Rabehi, A., Alharbi, A. H., El -Kenawy, E. S. M., & Napoli, C. (2025). Exploiting facial
  • [49] Bentegri, H., Rabehi, M., Kherfane, S., Nahool, T. A., Rabehi, A., Guermoui, M., ... & El -Kenawy, E. S. M. (2025). Assessment of
  • [50] Tibermacine, I. E., Russo, S., Citeroni, F., Mancini, G., Rabehi, A., Alharbi, A. H., ... & Napoli, C. (2025). Adversarial de noising of EEG
  • [51] Ouahabi, M. S., Benyounes, A., Barkat, S., Ihammouchen, S., Rekioua, T., Rabehi, A., ... & Alharbi, A. H. (2025). Real -time sensor fault
  • [52] Belaid, A., Guermoui, M., Khelifi, R., Arrif, T., Chekifi, T., Rabehi, A., ... & Alhussan, A. A. (2024). Assessing suitable a reas for PV
  • [53] Mehallou, A., M’hamdi, B., Amari, A., Teguar, M., Rabehi, A., Guermoui, M., ... & Khafaga, D. S. (2025). Optimal multiobjecti ve
  • [54] Rabehi, A., El -Hadi, M., Benmahmoud, S., Rabehi, A., Alharbi, A. H., & El -Kenawy, E. S. M. (2025). SOCA -CFAR Processor in A
  • [55] Bakria, D., Beladel, A., Korich, B., Teta, A., Mohammedi, R. D., Laouid, A. A., ... & El -kenawy, E. S. (2025). A novel enhanced Grey
Download